Comments for Geek Induldence http://geekindulgence.com Development. Technology. Life. Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:28:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 Comment on Glimpse + AppHarbor = Sad Face :( by Andrew Ma http://geekindulgence.com/2011/07/05/glimpse-appharbor-sad-face/#comment-8 Andrew Ma Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:28:09 +0000 http://www.geekindulgence.com/?p=22#comment-8 Looks like this was resolved. Details here: https://github.com/Glimpse/Glimpse/pull/88 Looks like this was resolved. Details here: https://github.com/Glimpse/Glimpse/pull/88

]]> Comment on Glimpse + AppHarbor = Sad Face :( by Troels Thomsen http://geekindulgence.com/2011/07/05/glimpse-appharbor-sad-face/#comment-2 Troels Thomsen Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:27:54 +0000 http://www.geekindulgence.com/?p=22#comment-2 I would recommend going with the X-Forwarded-For header. It is true that this could potentially break in other environments, but it is still the de facto standard when working with load-balancing. In case you're worried about the risk, you could add a variable on AppHarbor that gets injected to the configuration file. If this variable isn't set, you can avoid considering the X-Forwarded-For header. I would recommend going with the X-Forwarded-For header. It is true that this could potentially break in other environments, but it is still the de facto standard when working with load-balancing.

In case you’re worried about the risk, you could add a variable on AppHarbor that gets injected to the configuration file. If this variable isn’t set, you can avoid considering the X-Forwarded-For header.

]]>